In the book, How We Decide by Johan Lehrer, “Chapter
7: The Brain Is An Argument” states, “Regardless of which areas are doing the
arguing, however, it’s clear that all those mental components stuffed inside
the head are constantly fighting for influence and attention” (Lehrer 199). From this, I
question how does the human mind decide which component deserves more attention
and which actions/thoughts/etc. should be followed? How does a human know what
to do? Which side of an ‘argument’, thought or decision is ‘better’?
If “even
the most mundane choices emerge from a vigorous cortical debate” and the
decision-making process in general involves “a particular set of emotions and
associations, all of which then compete for your conscious attention”, how does
the human consciousness not get overwhelmed with this abundance of information (Lehrer 199)?
How can, for the majority of people, the decision-making process be viewed as
relatively easy and yet all of what has been mentioned is going on in their
brains for absolutely every decision they make?
Furthermore, I question if the
human brain is so complex and it is said to be the greatest machine mankind
knows of, how is it that humans aren’t using their brains to its fullest
capacity?
Works Cited
Lehrer, Jonah. "The Brain Is An Argument." How We Decide. Boston:
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2009. 196-218. Print.
No comments:
Post a Comment